The first ever official Twin Lizard (v4) music video:


Twin Lizard (v4) - Nemesis (featuring Texture and David Downey Jnr) by TwinLizardV4

Read ‘the making of’ here

Where There’s No I

dailymeh:

We live in the age of narcissism. I don’t believe for one second that this generation is substantially worse than the one before, or the five hundred before that. The young were immoral and lazy and unwise when Socrates walked the streets of Athens, and they are no different now. As were the old. But this generation has developed the technology to perfectly express the same narcissism our parents and our ancient forebears carried.

Nevertheless, in this age of narcissism, there exists an opposite impulse. Matt Webb quotes Borges: “All men, in the vertiginous moment of coitus, are the same man. All men who repeat a line of Shakespeare are William Shakespeare.” In another story, Borges writes: “I am god, I am hero, I am philosopher, I am demon and I am world, which is a tedious way of saying that I do not exist.” There is a saying, everyone’s favorite word is their own name, and there’s some truth to that. But isn’t there something exhilarating about Borges’s statement, too?

There is no actor, there is only the act. All men are every man, and every man is all men. It is the ultimate denial of narcissism: there is no ego. Much has been said about the so-called online disinhibition effect. When online and anonymous, we act differently, and frequently malevolently. But couldn’t this be a healthy antidote to the narcissism of social networks? Many people claim that anonymity is simply an easy way for people to act like assholes with no consequences. But I think part of it, at least for some people, is also a healthy impulse that is opposed to the egoistic drive.

I don’t know if there are any other animals that have such contradictory instincts: are there any creatures as fiercely individualistic, and at the same as fiercely social as humans? And while we celebrate our own egos, while we prop up celebrity mega-egos and build technologies designed for the generation of ego-worship, shouldn’t we also be celebrating this contrary impulse? Both individualism and collectivism can be ugly, but both can also be beautiful. It would be a beautiful thing if we could have arenas for the expression of both. When I get tired of fapping to the magnificence of my own ego, can’t I have somewhere to go where I can get lost in the masses, where I am everyone and everyone me?

This is one of the reasons I’m such a big proponent of anonymity, which seems to be evolving into public enemy number one. Governments want to kill anonymity so they can keep tabs on us. Companies want to kill anonymity so they can make money off us. Individuals want to kill anonymity so they can worship and be worshipped. I want to preserve anonymity so there can be a place where there is no I.

Bolding mine.

paxmachina:

Unknown - Ekaterinburgh, Russia
paxmachina:

Unknown - Ekaterinburgh, Russia

paxmachina:

Unknown - Ekaterinburgh, Russia

blech:

A white 500 pixel square JPEG with its colour data replaced by “lorem ipsum” in a hex editor. (Next time I’ll make it 512 pixels.)
Ironically, I had to export it as a PNG before Tumblr would accept it as a valid file to upload.
blech:

A white 500 pixel square JPEG with its colour data replaced by “lorem ipsum” in a hex editor. (Next time I’ll make it 512 pixels.)
Ironically, I had to export it as a PNG before Tumblr would accept it as a valid file to upload.

blech:

A white 500 pixel square JPEG with its colour data replaced by “lorem ipsum” in a hex editor. (Next time I’ll make it 512 pixels.)

Ironically, I had to export it as a PNG before Tumblr would accept it as a valid file to upload.

snowce:

Peacekeeper missile test, 1986
snowce:

Peacekeeper missile test, 1986

snowce:

Peacekeeper missile test, 1986

(via dovryn)

(Source: ophthamovntn)

"There’s a rule futurists use: go back twice as far as you wish to predict forwards. I have a new theory though, that’s hinted at by the popularity of Atemporality: the further we progress with our technology, the more all of time itself can (effectively) exist at the same time."
[Flash 10 is required to watch video]
[Flash 10 is required to watch video]

yearoftheglitch:

040 of 366

Source: a video consisting of one black frame and one white frame.

Process: iterative re-compression using Quicktime .MOV h264 w/ QT filters and selective manipulation of the raw data using a hex editor.

Concept: successive signal degradation returns to the initial starting point.

I love the aesthetic of these videos, perhaps even more so when watching them at work over a VPN that barely has enough bandwidth for video playback and introduces further glitches of its own so that each playback is slightly different.

People using pseudonyms post the highest-quality comments, Disqus says

untanglingtheweb:

two interesting things in this article from Poynter:

1) “real identity” is described as “verified by Facebook”

2) “many news sites have been using [Facebook’s plugin] to verify identity… and raise the level of discourse”

I’m ISO any research that correlates “raising the level of discourse” and “real identity”. It’s for #hate.

HT the magnificent Meg Pickard.

Verified by Facebook” as the new online identity passport….Of course some of us either  A:) Do not use facebook at all, or (and this is where I fall) B:) Use an account that is pseudonymous to interact with the web when required. Does this mean my fictional entity is my true online identity? What if I turned over control of my Facebook to a software agent or infomorph similar to Philter Phactory’s Weavrs to run my Facebook, would that be more real than the real me? 

I have a bad feeling about this - raganwald's posterous

At every point in the last forty years, wealth, health, and happiness in our economy have been built on the freedom to disrupt the entrenched powers, not the preservation of their rent-seeking monopolies.

Via Mark Pesce

"The Cyber-Industrial Complex"

Loving the Cyber Bomb? The Dangers of Threat Inflation in Cybersecurity Policy:

Jerry Brito & Tate Watkins

Abstract

There has been no shortage of attention devoted to cybersecurity, with a wide range of experts warning of potential doomsday scenarios should the government not act to better secure the Internet. But this is not the first time we have been warned of impending dangers; indeed, there are many parallels between present portrayals of cyberthreats and the portrayal of Iraq prior to 2003, or the perceived bomber gap in the late 1950s.
This Article asks for a better justification for the increased resources devoted to cyber threats. It examines the claims made by those calling for increased attention to cybersecurity, and notes the interests of a military-industrial complex in playing up fears of a “cyber Katrina.” Cybersecurity is undoubtedly an important policy issue. But with a dearth of information regarding the true nature of the threat, it is quite difficult to determine whether certain government policies are warranted—or if this merely
represents the latest iteration of threat inflation benefitting private and parochial political interests.

Via Jacob Appelbaum